blog-placeholder

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest in AI training, compliance insights, and new course launches—delivered straight to your inbox.

    calender
    August 23, 2023
    account
    John Rood

    New York State’s S07623 –A New Wrinkle in AI Regulation

    My general rule is to not get too excited about state regulations that are proposed and have yet to go through committee or a vote. Additionally, even when laws pass, they generally have a long timeline to go into effect (e.g. New York Local Law 144 passed in 2021 and went into effect 2 years later). However, New York State’s proposed new regulation (S07623) of AI is interesting, and suggests a new direction for state-level AI regulation that HR leaders and execs should be aware of.

    What’s New — A focus on Electronic Monitoring Tools

    S07623 does two big things — first, it regulates the use of electronic monitoring tools (“EMTs”) by employers. It:

    • Defines a narrow set of allowable purposes for EMTs
    • Requires that the EMT be “strictly necessary” and the “least invasive means” of accomplishing that goal
    • Requires that the EMT collect as little data as possible on as few employees as possible to accomplish the goal.

    If passed, this will be a very strict set of requirements that will require a ton of compliance and certification work for employers. Since the bill will require employers to “prove a negative” — that the EMT they have chosen is the least invasive means — there will be substantial room for interpretation. (Right of private action is not mentioned in the bill).

    What’s Old — Another State Level AI Audit Requirement

    New York S07623 includes very similar language regulating AEDTs as in Local Law 144 as well as proposed legislation like New Jersey A4909. Employers will be required to conduct and post an independent bias audit, and provide notification requirements to candidates that a tool is in use.

    One interesting twist is that this law will require “meaningful human oversight” of the decisions of automated tools. Employers will want to carefully document that their process includes a “human in the loop” on all employment decisions. (I am not familiar with any employer who really truly makes final hiring, promotion, or termination decisions without human intervention).

    These provisions both echo legislation introduced at the federal level — the well-branded “No Robot Bosses” and clunkier “Exploitative Workplace Surveillance and Technologies Task Force Act.”

    As always, we will continue to monitor emerging AI regulation as it nears a point requiring action on the part of HR leaders and execs.

    Proceptual provides compliance solutions for the emerging regulation of AI and automated hiring systems in HR.

    John Rood

    John is a sought-after expert on emerging compliance issues related to AI in hiring and HR. He has spoken at the national SHRM conference, and his writing has appeared in HR Brew, Tech Target, and other publications. Prior to Proceptual, John was founder at Next Step Test Preparation, which became a leader in the pre-medical test preparation industry before selling to private equity. He lives in the Chicago area and is a graduate of Michigan State University and the University of Chicago.

    Related Post May You Also Like

    Explore more insights, case studies, and practical tips on navigating AI. Stay ahead with our latest thought leadership.

    AI Compliance Obligations for EdTech: AI Regulation in Education

    September 27, 2024
    John Rood

    I spent over a decade in the EdTech world. One of the biggest challenges we all face selling into institutions,...

    HR Brew: Colorado’s New AI Law

    August 17, 2024
    John Rood

    We were pleased to be featured by HR Brew in their article on Colorado’s new comprehensive AI Law.

    Interview with Attorney Rob Szyba

    July 14, 2024
    John Rood

    We at Proceptual had the pleasure of discussing AI and employment law with attorney Rob Szyba of law firm Seyfarth...